All of the above men are or were Kings in our Vikings saga, the exception being young Erlandeur…his chance at King being thwarted by Ragnar Lothbrok! I have included Harald Finehair in the portrait as he will be arriving next season as King of Norway. What I hope to do with this series of articles is shed some light on the hows, the whys of Kingship, and give some brief historical insight on each of these men and their claim to Kingship. I will also look at a recent discovery of a Leadership gene, right to rule and divine destiny and how these concepts relate to these men becoming King. *Note* This is part one of a series that will look at each of these Kings and their claims or right to rule!
First, before anything else, we need to explore the concept of King, or monarchy in general.
A monarchy is a form of government in which sovereignty is one or several individual(s) reigning until death or abdication. They are called the monarchs. Forms of monarchy differ widely based on the method of selection of the monarch, and any predetermined limits on the length of their tenure. When the monarch has no or few legal restraints in state and political matters, it is called an absolute monarchy. Cases in which the monarch’s discretion is formally limited (most common today) are called constitutional monarchies. In hereditary monarchies, the office is passed through inheritance within a family group, whereas elective monarchies use some system of voting. Each of these has variations: in some elected monarchies only those of certain pedigrees are eligible, whereas many hereditary monarchies impose requirements regarding the religion, age, gender, mental capacity, and other factors. Occasionally this might create a situation of rival claimants whose legitimacy is subject to effective election.
The basic theory and premise of such divine right goes all the way back to Egypt with the Pharaohs linking themselves to the Gods. The future Christian interpretation of it just set down a different set of rules to follow. This principle and concept ties in well with the practice of hereditary monarchy and succession according to bloodline. Once one has established rule of a Kingdom, it is always wise to have some other means besides just might to back up one’s claim! This principle ensures that your hard fought for Kingdom will remain in the family for future generations and it also gives you an added cushion of authority in the eyes of your subjects who might think twice about rebelling against you if they believe you have some connection to the Gods! It’s fine to achieve a Kingship and Kingdom by force, but eventually people will tire of fighting on your behalf and you will need some other means to control and lead them into your way of thinking. What better means of control than convincing them that you have supreme right from the Gods above to rule them!
I know, I know, you’re getting bored with all of this and want to get to the more interesting stuff… I just have one last theory to bring up before we get to our Viking era Kings. This theory is a recent development and discovery related to genetics. Now you’re probably groaning to self- yes, you are, I can hear you! You’re thinking, What the Hell does current genetic research have to do with any of this! Well, please stick with me and let me explain!
In the past few years, there has been a vast amount of research done on genetics, DNA and how it might relate to us in various ways. Some of it has to do with genealogy and the ability now to better trace our ancestry, and of course that would include tracing Royal lineages- should some Royal ever require some need of proof that they are indeed part of Royal bloodline- or for those who just want to be able to say, Hey I am descended from Ragnar, Rollo, or others of historic fame. That in itself is quite interesting and I do plan to participate in that endeavor sometime soon.
If you are so inclined and interested, you can get more information about that research on these sites:
AncestryDNA project at Ancestry.com
TribeCode DNA Ancestry testing
Although that genetic progress is interesting, it is not what we are most interested in with regards to this discussion. The discovery that pertains more to us is that of a specific gene called the Leadership gene! A GENE has been uncovered that may help to create born leaders, or possibly trace the pattern in past leaders.
The leadership gene, known as rs4950, is an inherited DNA sequence associated with people taking charge.Scientists accept that leadership skills are also learned. But the gene may provide the vital push needed to make someone into a manager rather than a minion. Researchers found the gene after analysing DNA samples from around 4000 individuals and matching them to information about jobs and relationships. Workplace supervisory roles were used as a measurement of leadership behavior. The study showed that a quarter of the observed variation in leadership traits between individuals could be explained by genetics.
Lead scientist Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, from University College London, said: ‘‘We have identified a genotype, called rs4950, which appears to be associated with the passing of leadership ability down through generations. ‘‘The conventional wisdom – that leadership is a skill – remains largely true, but we show it is also, in part, a genetic trait.’’
Some of the greatest leaders in recent history include Martin Luther King, Mohandas Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and Sir Winston Churchill. Leaders do not necessarily have to be heroic or good though. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Genghis Khan were also great leaders in their own way.
The new research suggests at least the possibility that some of these historic figures were blessed with the leadership gene. Despite the importance of the gene, acquiring a leadership position still mostly depends on developing the necessary skills, say the researchers.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130115111553.htm
Now if I have completely confused you as to the relevance of this genetic discovery to our topic of Kings and their claims of divine right, let me try to put some perspective on it. The Royal dynasties now and in the past are based on some principle that their bloodline enables or allows them to rule. Granted, their claim is that it comes from God, the Gods, that divine connection or link. They knew nothing about genetics or DNA, they attributed their ability to a higher power. But, given the discovery of this gene, it would be fascinating to find this gene in some of those ancient rulers! Perhaps it was not God who destined or determined their fate or ability, but it may have been something in their bloodline from the beginning that allowed for the earliest of these rulers to be leaders and then pass that predisposition down to their offspring and future rulers! The research does conclude that this gene does not completely determine one’s ability or success but merely predisposes them toward that. It also states that having such gene does not equate to heroics or good, it could also enable a person with worst of intentions or morals to succeed in leading people in their direction.
As a genetic trait, it might be responsible for that certain charisma, charm or bearing that a person innately presents which would allow for people to follow them- good or bad! It may come across as an overall appearance, a self confidence, an air natural inborn Royalness such as some of our Kings and their offspring display. It could also be some inborn ability convince or sway people to your side, to your beliefs… some people are natural born salesmen! Ragnar certainly has it.
And, he has passed it down to his son Bjorn who is not King yet, but will be one day.
If Ragnar is gifted with such a gene then in our saga, his brother Rollo would probably carry the gene as well. Rollo does not achieve Kingship in history nor probably in our version of it, but he comes close in founding his own dynasty of Normandy. And, great Monarchs will descend from his line in history so we could probably assume that Rollo did indeed have this gene!
Whether we like him or not, Ecbert does have this innate trait, this ability to charm and control…
King Horik most likely had the gene bit it is one of those cases where he used none of it for good!
Does King Aelle have it? I would say, possibly but as in Horik’s case, it’s not been a case of any good coming from it? The only reason that I suspect he might possibly carry the gene is for the fact that daughter Judith appears to have it and presents a better side of it! This is of course in our fictional version of the history. Later we will attempt to look at Aelle in the context of actual history and what his claim or justification may have been. As I have mentioned previously, I suspect that he may have come by his rule and his Kingdom more by might than by any true right, but he may have had the gene, which would have enable him to sway people to his line of thinking…
Now for the moment, that leaves us with new comer Harald Finehair of Norway… we know next to nothing about him and can only gauge any thought or assumption on a limited vision of his outward appearance? But, from that appearance, I would say that yes he probably does have this gene.
I am going to include one other person of interest in this list because while he does not have royal blood as far as we know at this time, he does display this trait and characteristic. That would be Kalf!
And, if one bases the succession of their reign on such bloodline or ability, there may always come a point where a successor has not inherited such gene from his parent. That would leave your dynasty with a weak, ineffective leader such as our Frankish King Charles! In the case of Charles, any of the Charles that he may be representing in our version of history, we also need to take into account one other thing that may have affected their genes. With the principle and practice of hereditary monarchy comes a somewhat disturbing side affect. In order to keep your Royal bloodline continuing, your descendants must marry within a severely limited group of others who would presumably share this royal blood. This practice results in a great deal of inbreeding with close relatives. The early Christian church realized this and did put forth a number of rules regarding who one could marry. This might have been looked at as some sort of extreme Papal control and Bureaucracy but in reality, it was their means of dealing with the affects of such close inbreeding that led to much hereditary illnesses, instabilities and insanities being passed down through generations or ruling families.
Charles and other members of his Frankish dynasty were thought to be afflicted by various forms of such instability. So, while Charles may or may not have inherited the leadership gene, (my personal thought is that he probably did not!) he most likely did inherit some of the other instabilities of his family.
As long as we’re looking at Charles, let us quickly look at his daughter, Gisla… who may or may not be a real person. In our fictional account, she is quite young but she does seem to have moments where she displays such a leadership gene.
Since we have brought up the realities of inbreeding and instability, there is one other person to look at in relation to the leadership gene and to claims of right to rule. That person would of course be the Princess Kwentirith in our saga, who is said to be a daughter of Offa and who is now Queen of Mercia. Kwentirith is based loosely on some real women of that time period who did have some claim to rule. It was very rare that a woman would be allowed to rule but there were some early instances of it in Saxon history. It would have been due to the early practice of following the blood line and a woman being the last and only direct relative left to take over. That was the case of Kwentirith when her brother so conveniently died. We will deal with the history of Mercia and their rule later. For now let us just look at Kwentirith in respect to whether she might have the leadership gene and whether she also carries some inherited family instability! At her best, Kwentirith can present a charming and engaging personality and a regal bearing. She may have the gene which would allow her to put forth an initial image and presence that people would pay some attention to. Unfortunately, she also displays such an irratic and volatile range of instability that people quickly realize her instability! Is this instability inherited or due merely to her childhood environment? My thought is that it is probably a bit of both. She refers to the behaviors of her Father and her uncle, as well as brothers so I would think that some of the insanity is inherited, probably from a long line of inbreeding before the family might have converted and followed rules of the church!
I have given you some basic overall theories and reasons on the hows and whys of Kingship in general, and how they relate to our Royalty in the Vikings saga. In my next posts, I will deal with each King separately. Because all of these people have some real life historical basis, I will look at them in that historical context rather than the fictional one. Where ever possible, I will attempt to explore the fictional relationship as it might relate to the real one. The only people who do not seem to have any real life basis as yet would be Kalf, and Aelle’s daughter Judith. But, seeing as they are not yet rulers in any way, we will not look into their histories as it relates in this way! Also, I have already dealt with both of them in previous posts so we will leave it at that for the time being!
You can find my thoughts on Kalf in the previous post about Hedeby:
https://timeslipsblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/13/vikings-lagertha-kalf-and-why-is-hedeby-so-important/
Judith’s story is detailed here:
https://timeslipsblog.wordpress.com/viking-saga-judiths-story/
Based on the historical fact that Horik’s and Ragnar’s claims are both tied to the Crown and history of Denmark, I will look at them together in relation to that history. In looking at that history, it may also lead us to exploring Aelle’s limited history in Northumbria… mainly because when we look closer at the history of the Danes and the Angles who resided in that country prior to the Danes taking over, we will see the migration of them to places in Britain such as Northumbria, York, and East Anglia. I will also look at where the ruling line went after Ragnar in history because historically he did not rule for very long and his sons did not take his place in succession. Because of that, we will look at who did come afterwards, and what happened to his sons in history. This will include a look at Sweden where Bjorn Ironside eventually become a King.
We will look at Ecbert’s path to his rule and his claim in relation to Saxon history and in relation to the church because they backed his initial claim to his throne. That Church connection will also be a connection to the rule of Charles. We will also see in this history, the claim of one woman who bears some similarity to our Kwentirith.
We will look at Harald Finehair and his connection or claim to the rule of Norway in a separate discussion because while we all tend to look at the Vikings and Scandinavia as one inclusive entity, they were very separate kingdoms much further back than the Viking age! As they all migrated to Britain during various time periods, they located themselves in different localities and did not identify themselves under that one umbrella of “Viking” They did not even particularly like each other and would not have chosen to band together or associate with each other unless it was for such purpose of defeating a common enemy such as the Saxon English!
I hope that you will join me and enjoy the upcoming journey as we explore the rights and claims to Kingship!
Danish right to rule and history: https://timeslipsblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/27/horik-and-ragnar-part-of-the-oldest-monarchy-in-europe/
This article includes Horik, Ragnar, as well as Ragnar’s sons Bjorn, Ivar and Sigurd!
Ecbert’s claim to Wessex:
https://timeslipsblog.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/from-charlamagne-to-egbert-and-wessex/
Interesting. Michael Hirst and Professor Neil Price addressed the subject of why Viking kings, earls, and chieftains would ever convert to Christianity. They suggest that the motive was primarily political.
Though Scandinavian kings would invariably invoke the Norse gods to justify their rule, their polytheism was apparently not as effective as political propaganda. Shrewd Viking rulers observed that the monotheistic Christian religion was more thoroughly intertwined and allied with the state. This unified concept of “One God,” “One Church,” and “One King” emphasized the ruler’s divine right and the subject’s duty to obey the divinely appointed sovereign. They saw an advantage in converting and promulgating a religion that would presumably make their subjects more obedient and compliant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much of the reason for converting to Christianity was initially done for those political reasons! One major reason aside from the added authority and power of the divine right principle, was that the Christian Church had endless pockets and armies with which to back a ruler who they deemed acceptable. The early Danes had close ties to the Frankish empire and even though they were pagans at the earlier times, they did seek out assistance from the Frankish Christians in some of their early disputes over the throne of Denmark. The Saxons in England also saw the benefit of this and initially converted to get the power of the church behind them in their fights for crowns. This is how Ecbert managed to get his crown!
LikeLike
Speaking of “endless pockets,” I wonder how missionaries would broach the subject of tithes with Viking rulers. My guess is that this would not be a topic that Christians would want to mention early on while advertising their religion to pagan chieftains.
Probably the missionaries waited until after the baptisms and conversions were done before finally mentioning, “Oh by the way, now that you’re Christian, there’s this guy in Rome that you have to pay money to every year.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Clovis married a Burgundian princess. He was a pagan and she was a trinitarian Christian. Now most of the German peoples were Arian Christians or Pagans. The Arians followed Bishop Arius and not the bishop of Rome. Arianism was popular in the East, but the Pope never followed Arius. The Byzantine emperors were poor theologians, they were politicians not theologians. The Byzantine emperors also followed a very unpopular heresy called Iconoclasm. (that died out too) The pope backed a man named Athanasius(trinitarian) He was exiled 5 times and remained one step ahead of the imperial army. The main body of the church would adopt the theology of Athanasius. Arianism would die out. Most of Clovis subjects were Roman aristocracy. They were Trinitarians. So by adopting Trinitarian Christians, Clovis came early to the dance, and got in good with the Old Roman Aristocracy. IMO opinion, by aligning with the church, the new germanic rulers were in alignment with the Old Roman aristocracy. They never really went away, they changed their names. See the Black Nobility. The Old Romans became so closely bound to the church because when the empire split into two, the west could not stand without the wealth of the East. The west fell into ruin, and the church was left to pick up the pieces. (see Benedict of Nursia) Benedict started a chain of monasteries which would save western civilization. I think King Eckbert’s library is really Bede’s library. Bede was a monk. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Nobility https://www.durhamworldheritagesite.com/history/bedehttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/60548/Saint-Benedict-of-Nursia
Think I am kidding. The last name of Queen Victoria was Welf. The Welf were Black Nobility.(the old Roman/Lombards)
LikeLike
One other thing to remember, the tithe money the church collected provided social welfare for the destitute. That’s not to say that papal families did not financially take advantage of the situation because sometimes they did take advantage and enrich themselves. Hospitals and schools operated around the monastery system. Vikings don’t have anything like that. When Torstein’s two girlfriends got pregnant, he was supposed to marry them both and provide for the children. You could be tossed out of your village for NOT taking care of your kids. Look up Childeric the King of the Merovingians. He actually got pitched out for messing around a lot and not taking care of his women and children. Torstein’s offspring would be a burden on those women’s families. In a Christian village, if a boy like Ivar was left out to die, the monastery would take him and he would either die peacefully or they would raise him. That sort of social order would appeal to the pagans. Scroll down to places for the elderly, lame, mentally ill and blind in the medieval hospitals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_medicine_of_Western_Europe
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the founding fathers of the u.s.a. wanted to go back to the Roman Republic because they thought the whole king thing was a bad deal. This no king thing was the secret of their success. It is in a way, because just because you are born into a family doesn’t mean you can do the job. IT’s too much for one person, it takes more than one to carry a government. If you look it’s odd, Italy, where it all began is a republic. France, also closest to the Rome, is a republic. Greece is a republic. weird. I was thinking about what the seer told Lagertha. He saw a burning churning ocean and a city of marble. That’s turmoil. I remember reading the story about the real Rollo. He was expelled by the King because he stole something or did something. It says his mother tried to stop him being sent away, but to no avail. Perhaps, Rollo was going to marry Lagertha and he did something. We he’s pretty old and not married and Haraldson doesn’t like him. His chief did not give permission for him to marry. Maybe this something he did, caused Lagertha to marry Ragnar. I think she decided on him anyway because he was better and more stable. Rollo knows he’s guilty so he says nothing. Maybe Lagertha does not know which one is the father of Bjorn. Rollo did not tell his brother about any of this, because he may have deserved what happened to him. I think Ragnar is going to be really mad that Bjorn left Rollo behind in Frankia. “You must rule with your head not your heart.” I think Rollo is going to offer Ragnar an opportunity to farm there in Normandy, but since the failure of the English settlement, Ragnar will not be interested in that. He’s going to view this all as a betrayal because Rollo acted alone in accepting the treaty. (see I am king speech) Ragnar is going to send Bjorn after Rollo. I think Lagertha might tell Bjorn the secret. She does not know who is father is, and so the seer’s prophecy comes true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought you might find this interesting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansbertus Charlemagne had strong ties to this man. They have tested Charelmagne’s bones but have not released the results yet. I believe he has a Gallo Roman male lineage. He was buried in a Roman Sarcophagus. He was the first Emperor crowned by the pope himself. HIs father was Pepin the SHORT, his mother Bertrada of Laon was a tall woman. Charlemagne was about 6 foot 6, a giant for his time. Pepin was only a little over 5 feet tall. The people whose DNA is connected to the Normans do also have connections to the Old Roman aristocracy. Charlemagne goes back to a bishop named Arnulf of Metz. The bishop was often chosen from the Gallo Roman aristocracy. Arnulf was not supposed to have kids. He was such a talented administrator that he ended up getting married and having two boys. If you look at the Icon of Arnulf, he’s very dark with dark hair. He does not look like a Frank. Charlemagne had blonde hair and hazel eyes and looked looked nothing like Arnulf of Metz. If you want to see some horrible inbreeding, look at the Spanish Hapsburgs. The Church gave them permission to marry uncle and neice marriages and cousins. NOt a good deal. Most of the time the church discouraged this practice as it led to severe mental and physical problems.
LikeLike
Any insider news, as to approximately when season 4 will begin? I am aware it will be 2016, just looking for something slightly more precise. Sadly, This is taking forever!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, sadly no news yet!
LikeLike
Thank you for your response.
LikeLike
I do feel this will be Ragnars last stand. Though I do adore all the characters, well maybe except Aslaug, I will miss Travis. Just seeing that crazed smirk on his face, and knowing all of his short comings, it has been a love/hate relationship. I guess I need to accept the fact, he must pass the crown. Hopefully they will reveal when Kwentrith became with child, somehow I missed that one. I don’t believe peeing on one would have such a result! I know I am going to exhauste myself with speculation ever before season 4 begings. Is there a self help program for Viking withdrawl? JUST KIDDING! Just a spot of humor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol Teena, no it was not the peeing that did it but if you watch that scene you will see that later she does offer him some other form of comfort! If you find that self help program for Viking withdrawal… don’t tell me about it, I would prefer to remain addicted!
LikeLike
My apologies for the double post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on pmayhew53.
LikeLike
Just stumbled over this old post. Admittedly, my vision of our fictional Aelle is completely different from yours and for reasons, so let me just say one thing: If there is a gene that works the way you’re describing it, then of course Aelle has it! He has the force, the charisma and the attitude. He may not have the same skills as Ecbert, but that’s not about the natural predisposition and as you’ve pointed out one can have that and still be more or less skilled and successful. But there are reasons to think that Aelle (in the show) was fairly successful for a long time and just failed because he was presented with a new and unusual challenge that he couldn’t overcome because of the limits of his horizon. But I think that Aelle is exactly the type of person who would’ve been a fairly successful leader in the Middle Ages on a modest level like a small kingdom like Northumbria as he displays characteristic features of the warrior class of those days. My own comprehensive analysis and interpretation of his character in the show will be uploaded piece by piece this year.
LikeLike